All posts by Chris Buckley

Recent Opinions

Indiana Court of Appeals

Randy Tony v. Elkhart County
57A05-0906-CV-312

Civil. Reverses grant of summary judgment for Elkhart County in Tony’s suit he had been constructively discharged in retaliation for his worker’s compensation claims. The county failed to establish as a matter of law that Tony was not constructively discharged and there is sufficient evidence for Tony to proceed on his claim.

Z.S. v. J.F.
29A02-0907-JV-709

Juvenile. Affirms order granting mother J.F.’s motion for relief from judgment. Mother established surprise, where father failed to serve her, whom he knew was without counsel, with his petition for custody and she was unaware that the custody would be determined at the final hearing.

Crystal Sanquenetti v. State of Indiana
61A01-0907-CR-344

Criminal. Reverses 4-year sentence following guilty plea to Class C felony nonsupport of a dependent child. The nature of Sanquenetti’s offense doesn’t support the advisory sentence. Remands with instructions for the trial court to revise her sentence to 2 years executed. Judge Vaidik dissents.

Aaron Michael Rohr v. State of Indiana
40A01-0906-CR-302

Criminal. Affirms denial of Rohr’s request to set bail. The hearing held by the trial court didn’t deny Rohr the ability to challenge evidence against him and to present evidence of his innocence, his right to present witnesses, or his right to counsel. The affidavit he submitted doesn’t establish his innocence in the murder of his girlfriend’s son.

Emmanuel Dwayne Branch v. State of Indiana
82A04-0905-CR-265

Criminal. Affirms sufficiency of the evidence supporting Branch’s conviction for failing to register as a sex offender as a Class D felony. Although Branch didn’t have a new principal residence, his principal residence address did change and he was required to register the change of his address within 72 hours pursuant to I.C. 11-8-8-11. Judge Riley dissents.

Burkhart Advertising, Inc. v. City of Fort Wayne
02A03-0904-CV-183

Civil. Affirms summary judgment for Fort Wayne and denial of Burkart’s motion for summary judgment. Burkhart’s attempt to convert a breach of contract claim against its landlord into a takings claim against the city fails.

Grinnell Mutual Reinsurance Co. v. Joe Ault and Edie L. Ault, et al.
25A03-0905-CV-205

Civil. Reverses grant of summary judgment for the Aults and remands with instructions to enter summary judgment for Grinnell on the issue of whether Grinnell’s policy affords coverage for the Aults’ judgment against the Kings, who were insured by Grinnell. The policy unambiguously excludes coverage for any “bodily injury” suffered by the Aults’ daughter.

Kids Fine in Florida, Mom Facing a Custody Interference Charge

This should be a message to those of you readers that may not think that violations of family court orders are not serious business.

Chesterton Tribune Article

A Valparaiso man’s three children are on their way home from Largo, Fla., to be re-united with their father after Valparaiso Police said that the man’s ex-wife violated a judge’s custody order and removed them from their home and then hit the road, the Porter County Prosecuting Attorney’s Office said today.

Gun Lawsuit Misfires Over Clerical Error

Wrong amendment cited in man’s case challenging city’s gun-return policy; judge dismisses claim

Indianapolis Star Article

A hot-button lawsuit challenging Indianapolis police’s gun-return policy ended this week, but not because of the lawyers’ arguments.

It was a simple clerical error that led a U.S. District Court judge to dismiss the suit.

Court Issues Judgment in Absentee Ballot Case

Indiana Lawyer Article

The Marion Circuit Court has outlined the required procedures for dealing with the county’s absentee ballots following a suit that accused the Marion County Election Board of not following statute.

Among the findings:

1. An equal number of clerks should be appointed by both major political parties.

2. The Election Board shall retain the power to determine the validity of absentee ballot envelope signatures.

3. The Election Board shall maintain and provide to the major political parties a list of all noted absentee ballots.

4. An absentee ballot may only be placed into the ballot box after the absentee voter’s application is properly executed.

5. Placement of a name on a home foreclosure list or a voter getting an eviction notice isn’t a sufficient basis for a challenge.

6. The election board is also required to give to challengers and precinct board members written instructions before any election.

I will post an update to this article as soon as the full-text of the decision becomes available.